Case Study 3
David, 35 year old, married with 2 children, earning $60,000 income as an accountant. David’s wife Sarah (34) is currently at home looking after the two young kids Billy (4) and Zac (2). David’s family has the following debts, Mortgage $140,000, Credit Cards $4,000 Car loan $6,000.
David also had $50,000 life insurance cover provided under his superannuation policy
David was concerned about what would happen to the lifestyle of him and his family if he died or was to suffer an accident or illness that prevented him from working.
David selected $1,000,000 life insurance and $200,000 Trauma and Total and Permanent Disability insurance cover in addition to the life insurance provided under his superannuation cover. This combination of insurance cover (under super and standalone insurance) would deal with all of the family debts and provide the family with $900,000 to live off should he die. If David was to suffer a one of the medical conditions specified in his Trauma Insurance policy or suffer a total and permanent disability it may help meet the medical costs associated with the treatment of the condition without the need of having to dip into any personal savings or going further into debt.
David also considered the need to provide life insurance cover for his wife Sarah. Although she was not working, she was making a valuable contribution to the running of the house and looking after the children. David and Sarah decided to cover her life for $500,000 so as to help towards providing external helpers if Sarah was not around to look after the children. He included $400,000 trauma and total and permanent disability cover on her life.
David recently read about children who suffered serious illness and the associated costs in treating these illnesses. As a result he included his two children for $50,000 each for child’s trauma insurance as part of his own Life insurance policy to help towards such costs.
David was also concerned if he should suffer an illness that prevented him from working he also chose to protect his Income with income protection insurance up to the maximum possible 75% of the current income. David’s employer provides for sick leave up to 3 months and without employment with his accountancy firm, David had no other income to rely on. David decided to choose $3,750 monthly benefit for his Income Protection cover (being 75% of his income, the maximum level of cover offered under Income Protection) with the benefits paid through to his 65th birthday. Despite his currently employer offering up to three months sick leave, David thought that it was likely that he would be changing employers and knew that most companies offered just 4 weeks sick leave. For that reason he chose a one month waiting period on his policy. David also chose to include an increasing claim benefit option on his Income protection policy, which if he was on claim the monthly benefits would increase to help keep up with inflation.
Although David assumed his income will increase over time he chose a level premium option. Level premiums are slightly more expensive than stepped premiums in the first few years of the policy, however over the term of the policy as the longer term savings of level premiums typically far outweighed the short term savings of stepped premiums.